Executive order to ban fishing???

[brendanc]

There is a lot of talk going on in the recreational fishing community about a possible executive order that could be issued by the Obama Administration that would prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing some of the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters. The information below is from an article written by Robert Montgomery from ESPN Outdoors. There has been a lot of chatter surrounding both the topic and ESPN Article. Has anyone seen this? What is your take on this situation?

SOURCE ARTICLE

---------------------------------------------

This is a column from Robert Montgomery for ESPN Outdoors. As a Senior Writer for BASS Publications, Montgomery has written about conservation, environment, and access issues for more than two decades. It's part of a series of articles from Montgomery on the issue. See a response from editor Steve Bowman regarding concerns with this column.

The Obama administration has ended public input for a federal strategy that could prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing some of the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes, and even inland waters.

This announcement comes at the time when the situation supposedly still is "fluid" and the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force still hasn't issued its final report on zoning uses of these waters.

Fishing industry insiders, who have negotiated for months with officials at the Council on Environmental Quality and bureaucrats on the task force, had grown concerned that the public input would not be taken into account.

"When the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) completed their successful campaign to convince the Ontario government to end one of the best scientifically managed big-game hunts in North America (spring bear), the results of their agenda had severe economic impacts on small family businesses and the tourism economy of communities across northern and central Ontario," said Phil Morlock, director of environmental affairs for Shimano.

"Now we see NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) and the administration planning the future of recreational fishing access in America based on a similar agenda of these same groups and other Big Green anti-use organizations, through an Executive Order by the President. The current U.S. direction with fishing is a direct parallel to what happened in Canada with hunting: The negative economic impacts on hard-working American families and small businesses are being ignored.

"In spite of what we hear daily in the press about the President's concern for jobs and the economy and contrary to what he stated in the June order creating this process, we have seen no evidence from NOAA or the task force that recreational fishing and related jobs are receiving any priority."

Unless more anglers speak up to their Congressional representatives so their input will be considered, it appears the task force will issue a final report for "marine spatial planning" by late March. President Barack Obama then could possibly issue an Executive Order to implement its recommendations.

Led by NOAA's Jane Lubchenco, the task force has shown no overt dislike of recreational angling. As ESPN previously reported, WWF, Greenpeace, Defenders of Wildlife, Pew Environment Group and others produced a document entitled "Transition Green" shortly after Obama was elected in 2008.

What has happened since suggests that the task force has been in lockstep with that position paper, according to Morlock.

In late summer, just after the administration created the task force, these groups produced "Recommendations for the Adoption and Implementation of an Oceans, Coasts, and Great Lakes National Policy." This document makes repeated references to "overfishing," but doesn't reference recreational angling, its importance, and its benefits, both to participants and the resource.

Additionally, some of these same organizations have revealed their anti-fishing bias with their attempts to ban tackle containing lead in the United States and Canada.

Also, recreational angling and commercial fishing have been lumped together as harmful to the resource, despite protests by the angling industry.

Morlock's evidence of collusion -- the green groups began clamoring for an Executive Order to implement the task force's recommendations even before the public comment period ended in February.

On Feb. 12, the New York Times reported on that "President Obama and his team are preparing an array of actions using his executive power to advance energy, environmental, fiscal and other domestic policy priorities."

Click here for archiveMorlock fears that "what we're seeing coming at us is an attempted dismantling of the science-based fish and wildlife model that has served us so well. There's no basis in science for the agendas of these groups who are trying to push the public out of being able to fish and recreate.

"Conflicts (user) are overstated and problems are manufactured. It's all just an excuse to put us off the water."

In the wake of the task force's framework document, the Congressional Sportsmen's Foundation (CSF) and its partners in the U.S. Recreational Fishing & Boating Coalition again voiced their concerns to the administration.

"Some of the potential policy implications of this interim framework have the potential to be a real threat to recreational anglers who not only contribute billions of dollars to the economy and millions of dollars in tax revenues to support fisheries conservation, but who are also the backbone of the American fish and wildlife conservation ethic," said CSF President Jeff Crane.

Morlock, a member of the CSF board, added, "There are over one million jobs in America supported coast to coast by recreational fishing. The task force has not included any accountability requirements in their reports for evaluating or mitigating how the new policies they are drafting will impact the fishing industry or related economies.

"Given that the scope of this process appears to include a new set of policies for all coastal and inland waters of the United States, the omission of economic considerations is inexcusable."

This is not the only access issue threatening the public's right to fish, but it definitely is the most serious, according to Chris Horton, national conservation director for BASS.

"With what's being created, the same principles could apply inland as apply to the oceans," he said. "Under the guise of 'marine spatial planning' entire watersheds could be shut down, even 2,000 miles up a river drainage from the ocean.

"Every angler needs to be aware because if it's not happening in your backyard today or tomorrow, it will be eventually.

"We have one of the largest voting blocks in the country and we need to use it. We must not sit idly by."

SOURCE ARTICLE

[brendanc]

Link to more archived info on this subject from ESPN ANGLING FOR ACCESS INFO

[brendanc]

Wow... nobody cares about this? or is it that no one wants to read such a long post... >/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink" height="15" width="15" /> This is important stuff going on, everyone should at least read this.

[Fire Ball]

Originally Posted By: BrendanWow... nobody cares about this? or is it that no one wants to read such a long post... >/wink.gif" alt="wink" title="wink" height="15" width="15" /> This is important stuff going on, everyone should at least read this.
Well, this whole thing is just a hoax. I read about on a couple different websites. Plus the post is really long, lol.

[swimbait101]

how is it a hoax?

[kspringer]

WOW, Brendan is this really real???? When is this suppose to start going into action???

[Fire Ball]

Originally Posted By: swimbait101how is it a hoax?
It is not a truthful story.

Originally Posted By: kspringerWOW, Brendan is this really real???? When is this suppose to start going into action???
No, it isn't real. That is why I said it was a hoax.
Here is one of the MANY articles: http://deadspin.com/5490210/espncom-hel ... hing-rumor

[brendanc]

Hold on, slow down... I don't want people to miss the point of the post (my fault)...

There is no "FISHING BAN" or "EXECUTIVE ORDER TO BAN FISHING" there is a "MISUNDERSTANDING" that has got the attention of a lot of people.

The New York Times' website published an ARTICLE on March 11, 2010 written by Allison Winter from Greenwire. Her article does a very good job of explaining the situation.

The post is about the fact that there was a lot of rumors and controversy floating around about this article written by Robert Montgomery. Most of what had been written was his "opinion" and I was just wondering what other people thought about the situation. That's why the pole was asking if you agreed/disagreed with his "view point".

ANGLING FOR ACCESS INFO

I think choosing the word "HOAX" is a bit strong, perhaps "misunderstanding" would better fit the circumstance? Does anyone really think this many people would assemble for a hoax in front of the Capital? They were there because of increasing regulations on catch limits among other things.



I think another point to keep in mind is that because everyone "flipped out" over the near mention or rumors of restricting waters, a very loud message was sent out from the fishing community:

"Don't even think about it!"